|
By KEITH BRADSHER New York
Times, July 16, 2003
HONG KONG, July 16 — The combative secretary of security here, who led
a push for stringent internal-security laws that prompted 500,000 people
to march in protest on July 1, announced tonight that she had resigned,
in what appeared to be another big victory for this city's democracy
movement.
Regina Ip has overseen the city's police, immigration, customs and
other uniformed officers since July of 1998, and has often been seen as
Beijing's enforcer here. She kept a sword from the People's Liberation
Army at the front of her desk and consistently took the lead on
controversial issues, such as ordering immigration officers to raid homes
last year to find people who had lost the right to live in Hong Kong
after Beijing intervened in a legal battle here.
The proposed security legislation, demanded by Beijing but deeply
unpopular here, proved the touchiest issue of all for Mrs. Ip. As other
Hong Kong officials hung back, including Tung Chee-hwa, the territory's
chief executive, Mrs. Ip took the lead in trying to persuade the public
and the Legislature to accept the bill.
Her efforts became almost as controversial as the bill itself, and
demonstrators toted effigies of her at the July 1 march and more recent
rallies. Three days before the march on July 1, she declared that she
would not feel any pressure no matter how many people showed up, and
suggested that people might go only because they had nothing better to do
on the holiday, the sixth anniversary of Britain's handover of Hong Kong
to China.
Mrs. Ip and Mr. Tung said in separate statements this evening that she
had actually submitted her resignation on June 25, and that Mr. Tung had
tried to talk her out of it before finally accepting it. Under the
employment contracts for top officials here, resignations become
effective 30 days after submission if they are accepted, so Mrs. Ip will
leave office on July 25.
The government's insistence that Mrs. Ip gave her resignation three
weeks ago, but that nobody found out about it until now despite massive
local and international media coverage, struck political experts as
significant. "The government obviously doesn't want it to look like she's
resigning under pressure from the demonstrations," said Michael Davis, a
professor of law and public affairs at the Chinese University of Hong
Kong.
Mr. Tung did not announce a successor for Mrs. Ip. As a minister-level
appointment, her successor must be approved first by Beijing. Filling the
job could be difficult, as talented people with political futures may be
leery of a position that frequently involves choosing between what
Beijing wants and what local residents want.
In an open letter addressed to "citizens of Hong Kong," Mrs. Ip said
without elaborating that her decision was "entirely due to personal
reasons." Mrs. Ip had taken a short personal leave at the end of December
because of what a government official described at the time as stress
related to the controversy over the security legislation.
In her letter, Mrs. Ip strongly defended the security bill, which
would set long jail sentences for sedition, subversion, secession and
treason. She said that she deeply regretted that the legislature has not
yet passed the bill and added that, "I am confident that my successor
will be able to accomplish this task in good time."
Mr. Tung announced on July 5 that he was removing three of the most
controversial provisions from the bill, including one that would have
allowed Mrs. Ip, as secretary for security, to ban any Hong Kong group
that was subordinate to an organization banned on the mainland for
national security reasons.
But the march so rattled the city's business leaders that the chairman
of the pro-business party resigned from Mr. Tung's cabinet the following
night. That left Mr. Tung without the votes to push the bill through the
legislature and forcing him the next morning, July 7, to postpone further
consideration of the bill.
No new timetable has been set for the bill, which Mr. Tung and Mrs. Ip
had wanted the Legislative Council to pass on July 9.
The July 1 march was the largest public demonstration in the People's
Republic of China since the Tiananmen Square protests that the Chinese
military bloodily suppressed in 1989. After giving unclear and even
contradictory signals in the first week after the rally here, Beijing has
been taking a harder line lately.
Gao Siren, the head of Beijing's liaison office here, called on
Tuesday for Hong Kong residents to focus more on the economy than on
politics.
Mr. Tung's decision to accept Mrs. Ip's resignation is striking not
just because it inevitably gives the appearance that Beijing is yielding
to public pressure, but also because of Mr. Tung's refusal over the past
year to accept the resignations of other senior officials. Antony Leung,
Hong Kong's financial secretary, offered his resignation this spring
after it emerged that he bought a luxury car six weeks before announcing
the government would more than double the taxes on such cars. |