Wei
Jingsheng Foundation News and Article Release Issue: A838-W536
魏京生基金会新闻与文章发布号： A838-W536
Release
Date: September 14, 2014
发布日：2014年9月14日
Topic:
The Scheme for Hong Kong by the Chinese Communist Regime -- Wei Jingsheng
标题：中共当局的香港做局 -- 魏京生
Original
Language Version: Chinese (Chinese version at the end)
此号以中文为准（英文在前，中文在后）
Note:
Please use "Simplified Chinese (GB2312)" encoding to view the Chinese
parts of this release. If this
mail does not display properly in your email program, please send your request
for special delivery to us or visit:
http://www.weijingsheng.org/report/report2014/report2014-09/WeiJS140914HKandChinaA838-W536.htm which
contains identical information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The
Scheme for Hong Kong by the Chinese Communist Regime
--
Wei Jingsheng
Speaking
of Hong Kong affairs, most people regard them as issues outside of Mainland
China, include the Chinese Communist regime itself. The Communist regime directly aligned affairs in Hong Kong
and Macao with Taiwan. Thus the
whole world can only act according to those rules as well. They placed Hong Kong and Macao with
others such as the Diaoyu Islands and the islands in the South China Sea -- a
zone in the middle that is not under direct jurisdiction of the Chinese
Communist regime, regardless if it really has sovereignty or just claims so.
The
frantic patriotic youths in China would be upset upon hearing this. They argue that "we have troops
there and it is ours." Their
saying so would be like what bandits and warlords say, without any
understanding of law. The United
States has troops in Japan and many other places. But how could anyone claim Japan to be the territory of the
USA?
Americans
are not bandits, so they do not even have this kind of thought. But these poor frantic youths in China
would treat a feather like an arrow, to be plausible even though they play the
role of bandits. They actions
remind me of one of the Communist leaders in China, Wang Zhen, who sounded so
righteous and proud to be a bandit, even after the Tiananmen Massacre in
Beijing in 1989. In fact, they are
even less than bandits, because privately true bandits do know what "shame"
is.
This
position on Hong Kong was a mode due to the Hong Kong Basic Law decided in
consultation back then between two persons worshiped by these frantic youths in
China: Deng Xiaoping and Mrs. Margaret Thatcher. If these frantic youths are so angry with this Basic Law in
Hong Kong, then they should scold on Deng Xiaoping for "giving away
sovereignty and humiliating the country", why did they yell at the
Britons?
The
reason that the Britons could force Deng to bow, or why Deng could be a great
opportunist, is because of what was not clearly spelled out in the Basic Law:
that the living conditions in Hong Kong were and are fundamentally different
from the conditions of the people in Mainland China. People in Hong Kong have become accustomed to a free environment
that has a rule of law, human rights, and is close to being democratic.
The
frantic youths will say with pity: if Deng Xiaoping did not give them so called
"autonomy", then what could the people in Hong Kong do? However, Deng was not as foolish as
them, for he did have the IQ that a politician should have. What could the people in Hong Kong
do? Look at now even after 14
years of slow degradation. If Deng
Xiaoping did not compromise then, the situation would be worse than today. The direct result would be a situation
out of control.
Why? Because there is a principle concerning
humans' requirements for their living conditions: they evolve upward, not
downward. Many people in Mainland
China cannot understand why the people of Hong Kong would rather die for
freedom than surrender -- do not people in Hong Kong know forbearance and
tolerance? We could rebut them by
asking if the city dwellers in the Mainland could tolerate "re-education
by the peasants" by moving to the countryside. Why do not they know forbearance and tolerance, yet still
claim to be "wrongfully treated" in the past even only these city
dwellers were sent to the countryside several decades ago?
The
frantic youths do not have the intelligence of an average peasant in the
countryside in China. When I was
in the countryside, the peasants told me in an apologetic tone: "Sorry you
are wrongfully treated." I
asked them why. They said it is
because they were concerned that a city person like me could not get used to
the life in the villages and could not tolerate the hardship. Now the people in Hong Kong do not want
to be wrongfully treated like people in Mainland China. They would rather die than submit
themselves, for the same reason.
The
IQ of Deng Xiaoping was high enough to recognize this common sense, as well as
he knew the need of forbearance.
Thus Deng had to acknowledge the autonomy rights of people in Hong
Kong. His approach was to leave
the unsolvable problem to the future generations. More, Deng Xiaoping took the strategy of boiling frogs from
the warm water -- by taking small steps to make the leaders of the masses
surrender. One day when the death
comes to the door, the people in Hong Kong would not realize it. By then, where the water reached it
will be a ditch, the issue of Hong Kong's true return to China would be solved
naturally. This critical thinking
is just like when Communist China started the Sino-Vietnam war in 1979. A false victory is still a victory, for
the key is that if the people in China are fooled. Where to put his face is not so important.
Now
will Xi Jinping be able to achieve what Deng Xiaoping did -- to withdraw when
it is difficult to continue? Or
are the people of Hong Kong already like the cooked frogs, for the Communist
China to easily recover the governance rights? It seems to me that people in Hong Kong are still alive, and
are yet to be fully cooked. They
still have the courage to fight to their death. They are ready to go without a way to turn around. Only if Xi Jinping takes a step back,
could he avoid a disaster.
Again,
Xi should learn from Deng that where to put his face is not so important. What is important is to evaluate the
situation correctly without capsizing the ship. These frantic youths are relatively foolish, but not so the
people who set up the scheme. They
are smiling behind the scenes.
They are waiting for Xi Jinping to not budge to save his face, thus to
produce a bloody event due to the stubbornness of the Cantonese people. That result would force Xi Jinping to
step down.
Nowadays,
the people of Mainland China support people in Hong Kong in their fight for
freedom, not in the same lukewarm way as people in Hong Kong supported people
in the Mainland back in 1989. At
that time, the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements
in China was under the leadership of people who rebelled from the pro-China
faction in the British colony.
They refused to put out the strongest action against the Communist
Party. They were able to make both
sides happy by shouting some slogans and sending some tents (to Tiananmen
Square). Of course, they had
various ways to convince the people, which is the strength of the people on the
left side.
Now
the people in the Mainland have long hated the Communist Party and are worried
about a lack of opportunities to revolt.
Even though there has been a history of people in Hong Kong insulting
people in the Mainland, even though there were times when people in Hong Kong
would not allow people from the Mainland to buy baby milk for their children,
these past slights are still not as important as the opportunities to revolt,
because to support people in Hong Kong in the fight for their freedom is to
fight for freedom of our Mainlanders.
Now or never, the most important is to revolt against the Communist
dictatorship.
The
West is not in the era of President George H. W. Bush, when Bush needed the
cooperation of Deng Xiaoping against the former Soviet Union. President Obama's returning to Asia
policy is not just a bluff. A
pillow will be delivered when one is getting sleepy. By then, how will Xi Jinping settle this mess? I think that Xi does not have this
ability, thus all he can do is to take the precaution of solving this conflict
at its budding stage.
Today,
the Chinese people are not the muddled people who let the others slaughter at
their wish back then. The
international community is not as it was that it has to please Communist China
and let it do anything it wants.
There is still someone who wants to be Mao Zedong, but he does not have
that opportunity. There is still
someone wants to be Deng Xiaoping, but history does not keep those favorable
conditions for him. So Xi Jinping
could only be Xi Jinping -- as the meaning of "Jinping", to have
peace in a short and close range only.
When you are against the current of history, you will have to step down
-- even Jiang Qing, who had the prestige of Mao Zedong, could not avoid that
fate. One should remember: Bo
Xilai is not the only person who covets Xi's highest position.
One
also should remember: it is not a shame to bow to the people. If one acted like Deng Xiaoping in
1989, one will have to regret it for rest of his life. Back then in 1989, Deng had the psychic
pressure of being pushed from behind, yet was unwilling to yield power due to
extreme selfishness. He became a
forever sinner in the history due to that one strike of wrong. This is the true reason for his regret,
yet he was unwilling to say it. I
am wondering if Xi Jinping understands this part of the chess game.
In
fact, it is not a shame if Xi does not understand. Most people do not really know about chess. I do hope that the collapse of the
Communist regime arrives earlier, but do not want to see the bloodshed of the
people in Hong Kong. Fortunately,
I am not the one to choose. It is
Xi Jinping and Wang Qishan who must make the choice now.
To
hear Mr. Wei Jingsheng's related commentary, please visit:
http://www.weijingsheng.org/RFA/RFA2014/WeiJS140908HKandChina.mp3
(Written
and recorded on September 8, 2014.
Broadcasted by Radio Free Asia.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This
is a message from WeiJingSheng.org
The
Wei Jingsheng Foundation and the Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition are
dedicated to the promotion of human rights and democratization in China. We appreciate your assistance and help
in any means. We pledge solidarity
to all who struggle for human rights and democratic governance on this
planet.
You
are welcome to use or distribute this release. However, please credit with this foundation and its website
at: www.weijingsheng.org
Although
we are unable to afford to pay royalty fees at this time, we are seeking your
contribution as well. You may send
your articles, comments and opinions to: HCP@weijingsheng.org. Please remember, only in text files,
not in attachments.
For
website issues and suggestions, you may contact our professional staff and web
master at: webmaster@Weijingsheng.org
To
find out more about us, please also visit our websites at: www.WeiJingSheng.org
and www.ChinaLaborUnion.org for news and information for Overseas Chinese
Democracy Coalition and human rights and democracy movement as whole,
especially our Chinese Labor Union Base.
You
may contact Ciping Huang at: HCP@Weijingsheng.org or
Wei
Jingsheng Foundation office at: 1-202-270-6980
Wei
Jingsheng Foundation's postal address is:
Wei
Jingsheng Foundation, P. O. Box 15449, Washington, DC 20003, USA
You
are receiving this message because you had previous shown your interest in
learning more about Mr. Wei Jingsheng and the Chinese Democratic Movement. To be removed from the list, simply
reply this message and use "unsubscribe" as the Subject. Please allow us a few days to process
your request.
*****************************************************************
中文版
Wei
Jingsheng Foundation News and Article Release Issue: A838-W536
魏京生基金会新闻与文章发布号： A838-W536
Release
Date: September 14, 2014
发布日：2014年9月14日
Topic:
The Scheme for Hong Kong by the Chinese Communist Regime -- Wei Jingsheng
标题：中共当局的香港做局 -- 魏京生
Original
Language Version: Chinese (Chinese version at the end)
此号以中文为准（英文在前，中文在后）
如有中文乱码问题，请与我们联系或访问:
http://www.weijingsheng.org/report/report2014/report2014-09/WeiJS140914HKandChinaA838-W536.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------
中共当局的香港做局
-- 魏京生
说起香港的事务，大多数人都把它当做中国以外的事务，包括中共也是这么认为的。他们直接就把港澳事务和台湾事务并列。所以全世界也就只能照规矩办事，把港澳划归成和钓鱼岛、南海诸岛一类的，不管是中共有主权还是声称有主权的、但却并没有直接管辖的中间性质的地带。
愤青们对此不满，要死要活的说我们住有军队，那就是我们的地盘。这是土匪和军阀的说法，不懂法律的表现。美国在日本和很多地方有驻军，哪能说日本是美国的领土？
美国人不是土匪，连这种想法都不会有。可怜中国的愤青，拿着鸡毛当令箭，当了土匪还振振有词。和六四屠杀后的王震一样，当土匪还当得理直气壮。其实他们还不如土匪--土匪私下里还知道丢人。
香港的这种地位，是当年愤青们崇拜的邓小平和同样是愤青们崇拜的撒切尔夫人协商制定的香港基本法决定的模式。愤青们要骂就该骂邓小平丧权辱国，骂得着人家英国人吗？
英国人之所以能迫使邓小平低头，或者说邓小平是个伟大的机会主义者，原因是基本法里没有明说的，香港人民的生存条件和大陆的共产党统治有着根本的不同。香港人民已经习惯于有法制、有人权的，接近于民主的自由环境。
愤青们会扼腕叹息说：假如邓大人当时就不给他们什么自治，他们又能怎么样？可惜邓大人他不像愤青们这么傻，他毕竟还有政客所应有的智商。能怎么样？看看现在就知道会怎么样。邓小平当年如果不让步，情况只会比今天更糟糕。直接的结果就是局面不可收拾。
为什么？因为有个规律叫做人类对生存条件的要求，是只能进、不能退。大陆很多人不能理解，为什么香港人宁死不屈地要自由，难道就不会忍一忍吗？那让你们城里人忍一忍，上山下乡接受农民的再教育，你们为什么就不能忍一忍，到现在几十年了还在喊冤呢？
愤青们连乡下的土农民都不如。我下乡时农民们见着我就说委屈了，委屈了。我问什么委屈了。人家很奇怪的看着我说，让你这个城里人到我们乡下来你肯定过不惯，谁能受这个委屈呀？现在香港人不愿像大陆人一样受委屈，宁死也不屈。就是这个道理。
邓大人的智商足以看到这个常识，而且也懂得忍一忍的道理，才不得已承认了香港人民自治的权利。他的做法是把无法解决的问题留给后人；而且采取了温水煮青蛙的策略--一小步一小步地让群众领袖们屈服，总有一天香港人连死都不知道了。那时候就水到渠成，顺理成章地解决了香港真正回归的问题了。这就和1979年打越南一样，假胜利也是胜利，关键看能不能忽悠老百姓。脸往哪儿搁并不重要。
现在小习能像邓老爷子一样虚晃一枪，打不了就撤吗？或者说香港人民已经被煮熟了，可以闯关斩将地收回治理权了吗？好像香港人民还活着，没被煮熟。他们还有拼死一战的勇气，而且是箭在弦上，有进无退了。小习只有退一步才能避免灾难发生。
还是那句话，学学老邓，脸搁哪儿不重要，重要的是审时度势不翻船。愤青们比较傻，设局的人可并不傻。他们正在偷着乐呢。等着小习硬撑面子不让步，那么以广东人的死硬脾气，非得有一场血案不可。那么小习就必须下台。
现在的大陆人民支持香港人民争自由，不会像香港人民当年支持大陆一样温吞水。当年的港支联是一批从亲中派里反出来的人在领导。当时，他们拒绝对共产党痛下杀手，高喊口号送些帐篷就左右逢源了。当然，他们会有各种硬道理说服老百姓，这是左派的强项。
现在的大陆人民早就恨透了共产党，就恨没机会造反呢。就算有香港人侮辱大陆人的前科，就算有香港人不让大陆人买奶粉的前科，也不如造反的机会重要。因为支持香港人民争自由，就是在争我们大陆人民自己的自由。机不可失，时不再来，造共产党的反才是硬道理。
西方也不是老布什求着邓小平要合作反苏的时代了。奥巴马正在并非虚张声势地重返亚洲，想睡了就给送个枕头，到时候习近平如何摆平这个乱局呢？我觉得习近平没这个本事，只能是未雨绸缪把矛盾解决在萌芽状态之中。
如今，中国老百姓已不是当年糊里糊涂任人宰割的老百姓了；国际社会也不是求着中共，任其胡作非为的时代了。有人想当毛泽东，但没人有那个机会了。有人想当邓小平，但历史没把那些条件留下来。而习近平就只能当你的习近平，只能近平不能再平。如果违背历史的潮流那就得下台，连江青挟毛泽东的威望也难免下台。要记住，不是只有薄熙来才觊觎你习近平的那个最高地位。
还要记住，向人民低头并不丢人。像邓小平那样就得后悔一辈子。当年邓小平被人顶着后腰又在私心很重不敢及早下台的心理压力下，一失足成千古恨当了历史的罪人。这是他悔恨但又说不出口的真正原因。不知道小习能不能看懂这步祺。
其实看不懂也不丢人，臭棋篓子占人类的大多数嘛。我倒希望共产党早点儿垮台，又不忍心香港人民流血。好在我不需要选择，是习近平、王岐山在选择。
聆听魏京生先生的相关录音，请访问：
http://www.weijingsheng.org/RFA/RFA2014/WeiJS140908HKandChina.mp3
（撰写并录音于2014年9月8日。自由亚洲电台播出。）
-----------------------------------------------------------------
魏京生基金会及中国民主运动海外联席会议以推动中国的人权与民主为己任。
我们欢迎任何形式的帮助与贡献。我们愿与世界上为人权与民主而奋斗的人们一起努力。
我们希望您能够帮助我们散发我们的资料。但请标明出处与我们的网址：www.weijingsheng.org
欢迎投稿（暂无稿费）或批评建议，请寄信箱： HCP@WEIJINGSHENG.ORG
魏京生基金会通讯地址：
Wei
Jingsheng Foundation, P. O. Box 15449, Washington, DC 20003, USA
电话： 1-202-270-6980
魏京生基金会网址：WWW.weijingsheng.org
中国民主运动海外联席会议及中国团结工会的网址为：www.ChinaLaborUnion.org
阁下之所以收到本信，是因为阁下以前曾表示有兴趣了解魏京生先生和中国民主运动。
倘若阁下希望不再收到类似信息，请回复本信并用 unsubscribe 作为主题(Subject)。