Wei Jingsheng Foundation News and Article: A1240-W857

魏京生基金会新闻与文章发布号：A1240-W857

Release Date: Sept. 4, 2019

发布日：2019年9月4日

Topic: Is the US-China Confrontation the Responsibility of the United States? -- Wei Jingsheng

标题：美中对抗是美国的责任吗？ -- 魏京生

Original Language Version: Chinese (Chinese version at the end)

此号以中文为准（英文在前，中文在后）

Note: Please use "Simplified Chinese (GB2312)" encoding to view the Chinese parts of this release. If this mail does not display properly in your email program, please send your request for special delivery to us or visit:

http://www.weijingsheng.org/report/report2019/report2019-09/WeiJS190904onChinaUSconfrontationA1240-W857.htm which contains identical information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Is the US-China Confrontation the Responsibility of the United States?

-- Wei Jingsheng

Recently, a group of US officials and scholars led by the Wall Street Journal criticized the hardliners led by President Trump. The conclusion is that the US policy toward China should be revised. In their words, "the U.S. strategy must also be resilient, i.e. maximize the benefits if China cooperates, and minimize the harm if it doesn't." (Please see related article at link: https://www.wsj.com/articles/has-americas-china-backlash-gone-too-far-11566990232 Has America's China Backlash Gone Too Far?)

This is the latest version of the appeasement policy and an improved version of the Panda-Huggers under pressure from public opinion throughout the United States. Of course, there is freedom of speech in the United States. You may even applaud the Nazis, but not many people will accept them. However, these Panda-Huggers are strong in the upper echelons of the United States and can influence the policy direction of the White House. We have to interpret and criticize, to avoid them misleading the American public and the Chinese people.

The new version of the Panda-Huggers has a premise as it seems that the US-China confrontation is the responsibility of the United States, and China is the victim. Now everyone is more and more aware of the fact that the unfair trade created by the Chinese Communist regime over the years is the root cause of this trade war. If the United States does not fight back, it will continue to decline.

The power of the Panda-Huggers was strong. For many years, no US President had dared to reverse this decline. Only President Trump bravely opened up this new trend that was considered to be against the current, and formed a new consensus and a powerful public opinion. Trump was thus elected to his position.

There was this deception by the Panda-Huggers for many years, as it is lightly described as they initially had the misconception that economic development in China can lead to the development of human rights and democracy. It seems that these Panda-Huggers were mentally handicapped to be fooled by deception without maliciousness. Then why, after discovering that they had been deceived, do they still spare no effort to formulate an alternative to the appeasement policy?

Therefore, there must be some elements to fool still hidden in this conclusion that they were fooled by deception. The judgment standard of the Chinese people is quite interesting. It is called: a demon would be hidden in the abnormality. It seems that the oppressed Chinese are indeed not as easily fooled by deceptions as Americans. The affluent life and religious beliefs of the Americans often cause them to release excessive goodwill, especially the inappropriate goodwill for the demons, which will cause huge evil consequences. The Panda-Huggers are using this excessive and inappropriate goodwill to deceive. We have to expose these actions by accomplices.

The first sentence of the new platform of the Panda-Huggers said: maximize the benefits if China cooperates. This seems to mean that the United States is bullying China and oppressing China for cooperation. The fact is that Chinese government has been bullying the United States for years, and the United States is only now asking to return to fair trade. Is it necessary to add so-called maximization in addition to fair trade? Is not this asking to return to the unfair status of the past? Like the hidden agenda of Sima Zhao, the minds of these Panda-Huggers are well known to the public.

The second sentence of the new version of the Panda-Huggers said: minimize the harm if China doesn't cooperate. If China does not cooperate, the United States needs to minimize the damage caused by non-cooperation. In other words, when the Communist regime in China continues to be tough and uncooperative, the United States cannot punish it. Even if the thief refuses arrest, the police still can't punish him, or you will be blamed as inhuman. The Panda-Huggers are making good use of the religious pan-love psychology of the Americans and trying to solve the problems for the Chinese Communist regime.

If thieves and gangsters do not cooperate, one must resort to force. This is the common truth of both ancient and modern times, in China and in foreign countries. Religious pan-loving people can do their best to demonstrate their boundless love, but they will not eliminate their police. Because they also know that only with power, they can deal with demons. Will it stop the crime or encourage the crime if the punishment for criminals is minimized? This question is the case in the field of criminal offences, as well as in the field of economic crime.

In dealing with domestic crimes or international crimes, punishment is the only thing that unreasonable criminals can understand. The correct policy should be: cooperation is not a deal that both sides must retreat one step, but the party that violates the rules must return to the rules. If that party doesn't cooperate, then it must be punished more severely, including disqualifying it from the business of fair-trading.

If they play unfairness, then return it with unfairness. Thus there is the true fairness. The Panda-Huggers want to continue this unfair situation, so it is not too excessive to say that they betray the United States.

Original link of this commentary:

https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/pinglun/weijingsheng/weijingsheng-09042019114613.html

To hear Mr. Wei Jingsheng's related commentary, please visit:

http://www.weijingsheng.org/RFA/RFA2019/WeiJS190903onChinaUSconfrontation.mp3

(Written and recorded on Sept. 3, 2019. Broadcasted by Radio Free Asia on Sept. 4.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

This is a message from WeiJingSheng.org

The Wei Jingsheng Foundation and the Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition are dedicated to the promotion of human rights and democratization in China. We appreciate your assistance and help in any means. We pledge solidarity to all who struggle for human rights and democratic governance on this planet.

You are welcome to use or distribute this release. However, please credit with this foundation and its website at: www.weijingsheng.org

Although we are unable to afford to pay royalty fees at this time, we are seeking your contribution as well. You may send your articles, comments and opinions to: HCP@weijingsheng.org. Please remember, only in text files, not in attachments.

For website issues and suggestions, you may contact our professional staff and web master at: webmaster@Weijingsheng.org

To find out more about us, please also visit our websites at:

www.WeiJingSheng.org and www.ChinaLaborUnion.org

for news and information for Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition and human rights and democracy movement as whole, especially our Chinese Labor Union Base.

You may contact Ciping Huang at: HCP@Weijingsheng.org or

Wei Jingsheng Foundation office at: 1-202-270-6980

Wei Jingsheng Foundation's postal address is:

Wei Jingsheng Foundation, P. O. Box 15449, Washington, DC 20003, USA

You are receiving this message because you had previous shown your interest in learning more about Mr. Wei Jingsheng and the Chinese Democratic Movement. To be removed from the list, simply reply this message and use "unsubscribe" as the Subject. Please allow us a few days to process your request.

*****************************************************************

中文版

Wei Jingsheng Foundation News and Article: A1240-W857

魏京生基金会新闻与文章发布号：A1240-W857

Release Date: Sept. 4, 2019

发布日：2019年9月4日

Topic: Is the US-China Confrontation the Responsibility of the United States? -- Wei Jingsheng

标题：美中对抗是美国的责任吗？ -- 魏京生

Original Language Version: Chinese (Chinese version at the end)

此号以中文为准（英文在前，中文在后）

如有中文乱码问题，请与我们联系或访问：

http://www.weijingsheng.org/report/report2019/report2019-09/WeiJS190904onChinaUSconfrontationA1240-W857.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------

美中对抗是美国的责任吗？

-- 魏京生

最近又有华尔街日报为首的一批美国官员和学者，批评川普总统为首的强硬派。结论是美国的对华政策应该修改一下。用他们的话说就是：美国的对华战略必须具有弹性：如果中国合作，美国可以把合作带来的利益最大化；如果中国不合作，美国就需要把不合作造成的损害最小化。（原文链接：https://www.wsj.com/articles/has-americas-china-backlash-gone-too-far-11566990232）

这是绥靖政策的最新版本，也是熊猫派在全美舆论压力下的改进版本。当然了，在美国有言论自由。你甚至可以替纳粹叫好，只不过没多少人会接受。但是这些熊猫派在美国上层社会实力雄厚，足以影响白宫的政策走向。我们不得不加以解读和批评，以免误导美国公众和中国老百姓。

熊猫派的新版本有一个前提，似乎美中对抗是美国的责任，而中国反倒是受害者。现在大家越来越明白一个事实，就是中共政权多年来制造的不公平贸易，是导致这场贸易战的根本原因。美国再不反击，就会继续衰落下去。

而熊猫派的势力强大，多年来没有一个总统敢于扭转这个衰落的趋势。只有川普总统勇敢地开启了这个当时被认为逆潮流的新趋势，并且形成了新的共识和强大的舆论。川普也因此当选。

熊猫派多年来的欺骗，最初被轻描淡写地说成是误以为经济发展可以带来人权和民主的发展。似乎熊猫派反而是被欺骗的弱智者，他们没有恶意。那为什么现在发现被骗之后，仍然不遗余力地要制定绥靖政策的替代方案呢？

所以说他们被骗的结论必然有猫腻。中国老百姓的判断标准挺有意思，叫做：事出反常必为妖。看来被压迫的中国人确实不像美国人那么好骗。美国人的富裕生活和宗教信仰，造成他们往往会释放过分的善意，特别是对恶魔们释放不恰当的善意，那会造成巨大的恶果。熊猫派正在利用这种过分的、不恰当的善意行骗。我们不得不揭露这种帮凶行为。

熊猫派的新版本第一段说：如果中国合作，美国可以把合作带来的利益最大化。这似乎是说美国在欺负中国，压迫中国进行合作。事实是中国多年来在欺负美国，美国现在只是要求回到公平贸易。难道公平贸易之外还要加上所谓的最大化吗？这不就是要求回到过去的不公平状态嘛。熊猫派的司马昭之心，暴露无遗。

熊猫派的新版本第二段说：如果中国不合作，美国就需要把不合作造成的损害最小化。也就是说，共产党继续强硬不合作，美国也不能给予惩罚。小偷即便拒捕，警察也不能惩罚他，否则判你个不人道。熊猫派在很好地利用美国人的宗教泛爱心理，极力为共产党解套。

小偷和匪徒不合作，就必须施以武力手段。这是古今中外通用的道理。宗教泛爱主义者们尽可以挥发他们的大爱主义，但他们不会取消警察。因为他们也知道对付恶魔，必须有强大的威力才能起作用。如果把罪犯受到的惩罚最小化，那是在制止犯罪呢，还是在鼓励犯罪？在刑事犯罪领域如此，在经济犯罪领域仍然如此。

对付国内犯罪如此，对付国际犯罪也一样，惩罚是不讲道理的罪犯唯一能听懂的道理。正确的政策应该是：合作，就不是各让一步的买卖，而是违反规矩的一方回到规矩中来。不合作，就必须受到更严厉的惩罚，包括取消其公平贸易的资格。

他要不公平就还给他一个不公平，这才是真正的公平。熊猫派要的是不公平的状况继续下去，所以说他们出卖美国一点儿都不过分。

本篇评论在自由亚洲电台的原始链接：

https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/pinglun/weijingsheng/weijingsheng-09042019114613.html